Hello Jan,

thanks for the reply.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
> There are actually some changes in git that are not as friendly for a
> shared repository, however most of those are optional or don't apply to
> 'bare' repositories. Specifically the newly introduced packed refs
> format (which is optional) and the fact that pruning a repository tries
> to remove the individual object directories.

Which means that the idea of shared repositories has not crossed the minds
of git developers :(

> This way I can update the source on my laptop even when my local Coda
> client is 'temporarily unavailable', but updates are still written back
> through /coda.

It might be hard to use Coda when a Coda client is "absent" :)

Regards,
Rune