On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 07:32:20PM +0100, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 09:47:06AM -0600, Nicholas Haggin wrote:
> > 	I decided to take Maurice's other suggestion as well and run a 
> > 	vanilla
> > kernel, and the system has not experienced so much as a hiccup. I
> > probably did compromise control, however, since I also disabled ACPI in
> > the new kernel. When time permits I'll build one with ACPI enabled and
> > compare.
> > 	But it appears the problem has been solved, for now.
> 
> If it doesn't crash with vanilla + ACPI either, please enter a bug in 
> our (Gentoo's) bugzilla. And if you feel like tracking down the bug
> yourself, try applying only subsets of the gentoo patches. If you need
> help deciding which ones, add me to the cc of the bug you submit.

My guess would be '4800_inotify-0.17.patch'. It seems like the only one
that adds some significant changes to the VFS.

Jan