Coda File System

LWP stack size (was Re: How to detect coda server has started)

From: Maurice van der Pot <>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:19:44 +0200
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:17:28AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Harkes <> writes:
>     Jan> But after thinking things through it really doesn't matter
>     Jan> whether we fork before or after LWP threads have started
>     Jan> since they are not kernel threads.
> This would however complicate an eventual move to kernel threads, no?
> ISTR some discussion of that, but I don't recall whether the
> conclusion was "yes, eventually" or "You Aren't Gonna Need It" (YAGNI).

While we're on the subject of LWP and threads... (I'll just hijack my 
own thread here if you don't mind ;) ), I have noticed a while ago that
glibc compiled with 2.6 kernel headers and gcc 3.4.x + coda is a bad 
combination. You can read all about it in a bug report that I submitted:

I'm not certain if you can use this information, but I wanted to make 
sure you are aware of it. Just in case you get bug reports about it.


Received on 2004-10-26 03:21:42