On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:25:12PM +0100, Mark Phalan wrote:
> I guess I was just thinking it would be a nice optimization for those
> cases where clients are strongly connected and trying to access small
> parts of huge files (bigger than cache). Its ability to operate in a

If the clients are strongly connected, and people only want to access
small parts of huge files, the obvious solution would be to use OpenAFS
(or maybe Arla, if they are still active).

Jan