Coda File System

Documentation Bug ? Log and Data sizes

From: Steffen Neumann <sneumann_at_TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date: 22 Jan 2001 19:36:21 +0100

We are setting up the production server now,
and I am planning partition sizes.

Going through the various docs I found 
several figure for RVM Log and Data sizes...

Data size seems to be consistently 4% of coda storage size.

But in the section "The Log Partition" in the document
LOG is the same 90M size than Data. Is that a typo ?

We'd like to use the following Partitions,
with a single server serving some 8 Laptops:

   Partition	StoragePurpose	Mounted	Size	Whether fscked   

   sda6		RVM Log		Not	30M	No
   hda5		RVM Data	Not	400M	No
   hda6		Coda FS Data0	/vicepa	4G	Yes
   hda7		Coda FS Data1	/vicepb	4G	Yes

So, is the Log area way too small ???
Does anything else look badly broken ?

Received on 2001-01-22 13:36:29