I would've thought by now that the BSDs would have solved the
insecure ownerships/permissions defaults by now.

OpenBSD appears to not have this insecure default.  

find / -user bin -print 

yielded eleven font files, nothing more.  I realize this is not the
appropriate
place for this debate, but I don't think 'bin.bin' just for the sake of
being
compliant with the NetBSD standard is the right answer.

Andrew

> >Wouldn't you agree that despite whatever the usernames/groupnames 
> >might be, 0.0 would be the optimum choice?  bin-owned anything
> >bugs me to death and is asking to be 0wned.
> 
> No.  On NetBSD, to follow the OS standard they should be bin.bin.
> That is numerically 3.7.   
> 
> -- 
> Phil Nelson                    NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org
> e-mail: phil@cs.wwu.edu        Coda: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
> http://www.cs.wwu.edu/~phil